![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
STRIKE CONTROLTHE PATTERN OF STRIKEThe pattern of strike expected in an average year. Variation in this pattern may be caused by differences in weather, patterns parasitic worm burdens or husbandry practices, such as shearing. ![]() [Top] STRIKE RISK
[Top] THE EFFECTS OF CONTROL ON STRIKEThe model can be used to give advance warning of approaching strike problems over the blowfly season and predict the efficacy of various control techniques and husbandry practices. The model can show the effects of different timing of insecticide treatments. In the figures the model shows the expected impact of applying an insecticide against fly strike under typical husbandry and weather conditions. The insecticide is assumed to be 99% effective when applied and to have a half-life of about 6 weeks and residual activity of about 8 weeks. In figure A, the treatment is applied to both ewes and lambs once, following typical practice, when the blowfly challenge is at its peak at the end of July. FIGURE A ![]() In B, treatment is applied to both ewes and lambs once, in early May, before the blowfly population can increase in abundance. FIGURE B ![]() In C the insecticide is applied twice, once at the start of May, and once in late July. FIGURE C ![]() The model clearly shows that the appropriate timing of treatment can have a major impact on the level of flystrike. Treating for strike later in the season, once blowfly numbers have already peaked makes the disease more difficult to control. Early season application, before the blowfly population can increase substantially in numbers, is particularly important. But, with the type of treatment modelled here, two applications are required to maintain a low strike risk throughout the year. The strikewise model is able to pinpoint the correct timing of these applications with accuracy. [Top] |
|
Strikewise, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol, BS8 1UG |